Fresh Perspectives on Technical Debt
Update, October 15: The issue has been posted on the Cutter website (Cutter IT Journal subscription privileges required).
Cutter is just about ready to post the October issue of the IT Journal for which I am the guest editor. Print subscribers should receive it by the last week of the month. Jim Highsmith and I will be reflecting on it in our forthcoming seminar on technical debt in the Cutter Summit.
This issue sheds light on three noteworthy aspects of technical debt techniques:
- Their pragmatic use as an integral part of Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC).
- Extending the techniques to shed light on various nuances of technical debt that have alluded us so far.
- Applying the techniques in new domains such as devops.
Here is the Table of Contents for this exciting issue:
Opening Statement
by Israel Gat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Modernizing the DeLorean System: Comparing Actual and Predicted Results of a Technical Debt Reduction Project
by John Heintz . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
The Economics of Technical Debt
by Stephen Chin, Erik Huddleston, Walter Bodwell, and Israel Gat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Technical Debt: Challenging the Metaphor
by David Rooney . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Manage Project Portfolios More Effectively by Including Software Debt in the Decision Process
by Brent Barton and Chris Sterling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
The Risks of Acceptance Test Debt
by Ken Pugh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Transformation Patterns for Curing the Human Causes of Technical Debt
by Jonathon Michael Golden . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Infrastructure Debt: Revisiting the Foundation
by Andrew Shafer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Action Item: Apply the techniques recommended in this issue to govern your software assets in an effective manner.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Overwhelmed by a “mountain” of technical debt? Let me know if you would like assistance in devising and carrying out plans to reduce the debt in a biggest-bang-for-the-buck manner. Click Services for details.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Written by israelgat
October 14, 2010 at 5:30 am
Posted in Events, Technical Debt
Tagged with Acceptance Testing, Andrew Shafer, Brent Barton, Chris Sterling, CITJ, Cutter Consortium, Cutter Summit 2010, David Rooney, DeLorean, dev/ops, Erik Huddleston, Governance, GRC, Highsmith, Infrastructure Debt, Israel Gat, John Heintz, Jonathon Golden, Portfolio Management, Software Assets, Stephen Chin, Walter Bodwell
Leave a Reply